#CALL OF DUTY 4 ENDING PRO#

Each one brought forth its own intensity and entertainment. ItвЂ™s fair to say that the sheer amount of customisation you find in Call of Duty nowadays has its roots here.ДЄnother net positive of the system was that it allowed players to gamble their COD points with other players in unique wager match types, such as Gun Game, One in the Chamber or Sticks and Stones. There was also a staggering amount of customisation items that players could buy with their points, including camos, face paint, reticles and custom playercard backgrounds. These could then be spent on new guns, attachments, perks and killstreaks. Players would be rewarded a set amount of points based on how well they did in games. Most importantly though, Black Ops implemented the COD points system of currency. And there was the Theater Mode where you could edit and save your best clips to show off to your friends. There was combat training, where you could practice against bots of varying difficulties. There was the combat record, where you could see just how good (or bad) you were at every aspect of the game in amazing detail. There was the emblem creator, where you could let your creativity run wild. Not only that, but Treyarch took the Call of Duty formula and added some important innovations. But hey, itвЂ™s better than being noobtubed to eternity, right?

#CALL OF DUTY 4 ENDING PRO#

Of course, itвЂ™s not perfect: the aforementioned lag and hit detection issues still cause frustration today, and things like the Famas and Ghost Pro are unreasonably powerful. The gameplay still holds up ten years later, and you can still find plenty of lobbies. It also means the game has aged quite well. And thatвЂ™s a good thing, because it means that Black Ops is a game where skill takes precedence over just being able to cheese overpowered mechanics. Not only does this make the game much more balanced, but also much less hectic. Grenades do much less damage, and quickscoping is much more difficult to pull off. ThereвЂ™s no game-ending nuke, and killstreaks donвЂ™t stack.

That means thereвЂ™s no Commando, Danger Close or One Man Army. Treyarch were mindful to trim away a lot of the game-breaking stuff that plagued that game. Similarly, Black OpsвЂ™ multiplayer plays much differently to Modern Warfare 2.

ItвЂ™s no wonder that weвЂ™ll be seeing a lot of these characters return in the upcoming reboot. Burns, whose performance as Frank Woods is one of the best in any Call of Duty. Meanwhile, Gary Oldman returns from World at War to once again play Viktor Reznov. Ice Cube, Ed Harris and Sam Worthington all put in solid performances as Bowman, Hudson and Mason respectively. ItвЂ™s backed up by some serious star power. ItвЂ™s clear that Treyarch went all-in with this campaign. ItвЂ™s also remarkably well-written for a Call of Duty game, with plenty of twists and turns along the way and plenty of things left open to interpretation (like that ending scene). ItвЂ™s a tale of subversion and conspiracy with a dark and gritty atmosphere вЂ“ perfect for a story set during the Cold War. In a franchise known for its Michael Bay-esque, blockbuster, high-on-action-low-on-plot storytelling, Black Ops is so radically different in its approach. It may not have seemed like it at the time, but Black OpsвЂ™ differences are the gameвЂ™s real strength and the reason why the game has slowly cemented its place as one of the best over this last decade. I contend that Treyarch managed it masterfully. How could Black Ops even hope to follow that, especially when it was so different in so many ways? Modern Warfare 2 had been wildly popular and touted by many as the best Call of Duty ever made. But at least part of the criticism, to my mind, was born out of the fact that it had such a tough act to follow.

Black Ops did have poor hit detection, issues with lag and server difficulties.

Call of duty 4 ending